S&P Global Offerings
Featured Topics
Featured Products
Events
S&P Global Offerings
Featured Topics
Featured Products
Events
S&P Global Offerings
Featured Topics
Featured Products
Events
S&P Global Offerings
Featured Topics
Featured Products
Events
Product Login
Emerging and Established Risks
Sectors
Published Reports
About Credit Ratings
Criteria & Models
Product Login
Emerging and Established Risks
Sectors
Published Reports
About Credit Ratings
Criteria & Models
Independent, transparent opinions on a company's financing or framework, grounded in our award-winning Shades of Green approach, which assess the extent of contribution to a sustainable future.
Get in touch with us to find out more.
An S&P Global Ratings Second Party Opinion (SPO) is an independent, point-in-time analysis of a sustainable finance instrument, program, or framework. Our SPOs, backed by the award-winning Shades of Green approach, provide additional transparency to investors that seek to understand and act upon potential contribution to a sustainable future.
Our combined global experience of assessing credit risk and sustainable finance and understanding of climate and environmental science uniquely enables us to provide companies with independent, point-in-time second party opinions that deliver the rigor and transparency that investors and lenders demand.
Our SPOs are a point-in-time analysis of a sustainable finance instrument, program, or framework and the characteristics of the issuing entity that are relevant for their implementation.
Our Use of Proceeds SPOs assess types of sustainable financing where proceeds are allocated to specific environmental or social projects. We offer three types of Use of Proceeds SPOs: green, social, and sustainability.
Our Sustainability-Linked Financing SPOs assess types of sustainable financing where the proceeds will be used for general corporate purposes, but incorporate measurable, forward-looking key performance indicators which are linked to sustainability performance targets into the financial and/or structural characteristics of the instrument.
Learn more about our Analytical Approach for Second Party Opinions and the Shades of Green Assessment.
Our Use of Proceeds SPOs assess types of sustainable financing where proceeds are allocated to specific environmental or social projects. We offer three types of Use of Proceeds SPOs: green, social, and sustainability.
Our Use of Proceeds SPO analysis has these key components:
An alignment opinion: Our assessment of whether the financing's documentation aligns with certain third-party published sustainable finance principles and guidelines identified by the issuer.
Shade of Green: For green projects, our qualitative opinion of how consistent environmental activities eligible for financing are with a low-carbon climate resilient future.
Issuer sustainability context: We comment on whether the financing addresses any of the issuer’s most material sustainability factors, and on the issuer's overall strategy to manage the sustainability factors relevant to the financing.
EU Taxonomy assessment: Upon request from the issuer, we provide an assessment of the alignment of the financing with the EU Taxonomy.
Other optional assessments: Upon request from the issuer, we may comment on consistency with the Climate Transition Finance Handbook (CTFH), the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), ICMA's practitioner's guide for bonds to finance the sustainable blue economy ("blue bonds"), or other external frameworks.
View our Analytical Approach for Second Party Opinions.
Our Sustainability-Linked Financing SPOs assess types of sustainable financing where the proceeds will be used for general corporate purposes, but incorporate measurable, forward-looking key performance indicators and sustainability performance targets into the financial and/or structural characteristics of the instrument.
Our Sustainability-Linked SPO analysis has these key components:
An alignment opinion: Our assessment of whether the financing's documentation aligns with certain third-party published sustainable finance principles and guidelines identified by the issuer.
Issuer sustainability context: We comment on whether the financing addresses any of the most material sustainability factors for the issuer and comment on whether the issuer’s investment plans are consistent with a sustainable future.
Our relevance assessment is our view of how closely a KPI is linked to what we consider the issuer’s most material sustainability factors.
Our ambition assessment considers whether achieving the SPT represents a significant improvement in the issuer’s sustainability performance and is consistent with the transition to a sustainable future. We consider the trajectory of progress the SPT represents as well as the entity's implementation plan.
Other optional assessments: Upon request from the issuer, we may comment on consistency with the Climate Transition Finance Handbook (CTFH), the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), ICMA's practitioner's guide for bonds to finance the sustainable blue economy ("blue bonds"), or other external frameworks.
View our Analytical Approach for Second Party Opinions.
Explore the strategies behind our client success stories: Case Study: Nordic Investment Bank.
Our SPOs are a point-in-time analysis of a sustainable finance instrument, program, or framework and the characteristics of the issuing entity that are relevant for their implementation.
Our Use of Proceeds SPOs assess types of sustainable financing where proceeds are allocated to specific environmental or social projects. We offer three types of Use of Proceeds SPOs: green, social, and sustainability.
Our Sustainability-Linked Financing SPOs assess types of sustainable financing where the proceeds will be used for general corporate purposes, but incorporate measurable, forward-looking key performance indicators which are linked to sustainability performance targets into the financial and/or structural characteristics of the instrument.
Learn more about our Analytical Approach for Second Party Opinions and the Shades of Green Assessment.
Our Use of Proceeds SPOs assess types of sustainable financing where proceeds are allocated to specific environmental or social projects. We offer three types of Use of Proceeds SPOs: green, social, and sustainability.
Our Use of Proceeds SPO analysis has these key components:
An alignment opinion: Our assessment of whether the financing's documentation aligns with certain third-party published sustainable finance principles and guidelines identified by the issuer.
Shade of Green: For green projects, our qualitative opinion of how consistent environmental activities eligible for financing are with a low-carbon climate resilient future.
Issuer sustainability context: We comment on whether the financing addresses any of the issuer’s most material sustainability factors, and on the issuer's overall strategy to manage the sustainability factors relevant to the financing.
EU Taxonomy assessment: Upon request from the issuer, we provide an assessment of the alignment of the financing with the EU Taxonomy.
Other optional assessments: Upon request from the issuer, we may comment on consistency with the Climate Transition Finance Handbook (CTFH), the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), ICMA's practitioner's guide for bonds to finance the sustainable blue economy ("blue bonds"), or other external frameworks.
View our Analytical Approach for Second Party Opinions.
Our Sustainability-Linked Financing SPOs assess types of sustainable financing where the proceeds will be used for general corporate purposes, but incorporate measurable, forward-looking key performance indicators and sustainability performance targets into the financial and/or structural characteristics of the instrument.
Our Sustainability-Linked SPO analysis has these key components:
An alignment opinion: Our assessment of whether the financing's documentation aligns with certain third-party published sustainable finance principles and guidelines identified by the issuer.
Issuer sustainability context: We comment on whether the financing addresses any of the most material sustainability factors for the issuer and comment on whether the issuer’s investment plans are consistent with a sustainable future.
Our relevance assessment is our view of how closely a KPI is linked to what we consider the issuer’s most material sustainability factors.
Our ambition assessment considers whether achieving the SPT represents a significant improvement in the issuer’s sustainability performance and is consistent with the transition to a sustainable future. We consider the trajectory of progress the SPT represents as well as the entity's implementation plan.
Other optional assessments: Upon request from the issuer, we may comment on consistency with the Climate Transition Finance Handbook (CTFH), the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), ICMA's practitioner's guide for bonds to finance the sustainable blue economy ("blue bonds"), or other external frameworks.
View our Analytical Approach for Second Party Opinions.
Explore the strategies behind our client success stories: Case Study: Nordic Investment Bank.
*As of January 2025
What is the European Green Bond Regulation (EuGBR) and why was it developed?
The European Green Deal, approved in 2020, aims to achieve climate neutrality in Europe by 2050 and to cut greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by at least 55% by 2030 compared to 1990 levels.
As part of the European Green Deal and action plan on financing sustainable growth, the European Green Bond Regulation, also referred to as the European Green Bond Standard (EuGBS), establishes a voluntary designation for green bonds which fulfil specific requirements related to the use of proceeds, reporting and disclosure. The designation aims to help direct and scale investment towards sustainable economic activities aligned to the EU’s climate and broader environmental goals.
For issuers and investors, the designation aims to strengthen the integrity, transparency and level of comparability of the sustainable bond market by providing clear definitions of what green means, in line with the EU Taxonomy, and standardizing reporting and disclosure requirements.
Issuers seeking a European Green Bond (“EuGB”) designation are required to disclose how they meet the EuGBR requirements pre- and post-issuance. In addition, issuers have to get external reviews of their EuGB pre-issuance Factsheet and post-issuance Allocation Report by an ESMA-registered external reviewer. They also have the option to request an external review of their Impact Report.
S&P Global Ratings Europe formally notified ESMA under article 69 of the EuGBR of its intent to provide services as an external reviewer during the transition period starting December 21, 2024 and is listed on ESMA’s website.
S&P Global Ratings brings 160+ years of credit ratings experience in providing independent opinions in complex, regulated markets. We are ready to support you with independent, transparent external reviews to help you navigate the complexity of the EuGBR requirements, so you can make decisions with confidence.
The European Green Bond (EuGB) External Reviews are independent, point-in-time analyses of a European Green Bond’s alignment with the pre- and post-issuance requirements of the EuGBR.
Three Types of EuGB External Reviews
EuGB External Reviews may consist of the following three different types:
S&P Global Ratings can provide all three types of EuGB external reviews above. In addition to the features above, all types of reviews include Strengths, Weaknesses, and Areas to Watch in the final report.
For further detail on how we assess alignment to the European Green Bond Regulation, please refer to the Analytical Approach: European Green Bond External Reviews and the accompanying FAQ document.
What is the European Green Bond Regulation (EuGBR) and why was it developed?
The European Green Deal, approved in 2020, aims to achieve climate neutrality in Europe by 2050 and to cut greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by at least 55% by 2030 compared to 1990 levels.
As part of the European Green Deal and action plan on financing sustainable growth, the European Green Bond Regulation, also referred to as the European Green Bond Standard (EuGBS), establishes a voluntary designation for green bonds which fulfil specific requirements related to the use of proceeds, reporting and disclosure. The designation aims to help direct and scale investment towards sustainable economic activities aligned to the EU’s climate and broader environmental goals.
For issuers and investors, the designation aims to strengthen the integrity, transparency and level of comparability of the sustainable bond market by providing clear definitions of what green means, in line with the EU Taxonomy, and standardizing reporting and disclosure requirements.
Issuers seeking a European Green Bond (“EuGB”) designation are required to disclose how they meet the EuGBR requirements pre- and post-issuance. In addition, issuers have to get external reviews of their EuGB pre-issuance Factsheet and post-issuance Allocation Report by an ESMA-registered external reviewer. They also have the option to request an external review of their Impact Report.
S&P Global Ratings Europe formally notified ESMA under article 69 of the EuGBR of its intent to provide services as an external reviewer during the transition period starting December 21, 2024 and is listed on ESMA’s website.
S&P Global Ratings brings 160+ years of credit ratings experience in providing independent opinions in complex, regulated markets. We are ready to support you with independent, transparent external reviews to help you navigate the complexity of the EuGBR requirements, so you can make decisions with confidence.
The European Green Bond (EuGB) External Reviews are independent, point-in-time analyses of a European Green Bond’s alignment with the pre- and post-issuance requirements of the EuGBR.
Three Types of EuGB External Reviews
EuGB External Reviews may consist of the following three different types:
S&P Global Ratings can provide all three types of EuGB external reviews above. In addition to the features above, all types of reviews include Strengths, Weaknesses, and Areas to Watch in the final report.
For further detail on how we assess alignment to the European Green Bond Regulation, please refer to the Analytical Approach: European Green Bond External Reviews and the accompanying FAQ document.
Please find below links to our Analytical Approach documentation and related FAQs for Shades of Green assessments, Second Party Opinions, and European Green Bond External Reviews.
Our SPOs provide a view on alignment to relevant market principles (such as ICMA, LMA, EU Taxonomy), and additionally assess the financing’s contribution in the transition to a low carbon future through our shading scale, which includes assigning Dark, Medium or Light shading, as appropriate (for green projects).
Light Green may motivate early movers and helps to recognize transition steps in the near-term, while Dark Green acknowledges those closer to the end of their transition journey. Beyond financing that is ICMA Green Bond Principles or Sustainability Bond Principles aligned, additional shades of Yellow, Orange and Red are also possible, indicating non-alignment.
In the short video, Christa Clapp, Global Head of Sustainable Finance Markets Analytics and Co-founder of Shades of Green, explains a bit more in depth how we assign the Dark, Medium or Light Green shades for green projects.
Largest external reviewer of green financings globally, by volume, and a pioneer in the green financing market – Shades of Green, which is now integrated into S&P Global Ratings, is a pioneer in the green financing market and provided the first green SPO in the market for the World Bank in 2008. S&P Global Ratings brings 160 years of credit ratings experience in providing independent opinions in complex, regulated markets.
Our global team of 1,700 credit analysts and 70 sustainable finance analysts brings together credit, climate science, sector and company capabilities in one place. Our SPOs assess an issuer’s sustainability strategy and financing frameworks, and the issuance’s climate risk and extent of contribution to the transition to a low carbon, climate resilient future.
We have breadth and diversity of experience with evaluating projects in a variety of sectors, both due to our knowledge (sector, climate, and regional level), and due to our robust SPO methodology. S&P Global Ratings' core experience is as a credit ratings provider dealing in regulated, complex markets.
We follow a highly efficient, yet analytically rigorous process, allowing clear timelines to access capital markets. Our Second Party Opinions are usually delivered in about 20* business days but can be expedited to 10-15 business days for time-sensitive and straightforward cases.
Our award-winning Shades of Green approach provides additional transparency on the use of proceeds to investors that seek to understand contribution to a low carbon climate resilient future. Our methodology is public and shading scale is clearly defined.
Recognized as an industry leader in green financing for the Shades of Green approach, both on quality and volume of deals, and winner of multiple industry awards.
*For use-of-proceeds SPOs, from receipt of all necessary documents (additional time may be required, depending on complexity; please allow an additional 10-15 business days for EU Taxonomy Alignment, where applicable). For sustainability-linked SPOs: typically 15 business days from date of sustainability strategy meeting with issuer, with relevant documentation provided at least 3 working days ahead of the meeting.
Please fill out the form so we can connect you to the right person.